T. Kamani ← Back to Work
Eco Travel Aid case study thumbnail
4 Months
User Research, UI/UX Design, Testing
Mobile Application
Figma · Miro · Notion

Problem Statement

Why do eco-conscious travelers still choose unsustainable options?

01

The Cost Barrier

37% of travelers avoid sustainable travel due to high costs (WTTC, 2024). Eco-friendly options consistently feel financially out of reach.

02

Single-Use Gear Waste

One-time gear purchases drive up both expenses and environmental waste. Travelers buy equipment for one trip, then never use it again.

03

Decision Fatigue

Unclear needs and fragmented information create cognitive overload, causing travelers to abandon sustainable intentions before they start.

Primary Research

Understanding the real
eco-traveler

🗣

10 In-depth Interviews

Corporate employees, freelancers, and students aged 24 to 35, primarily in Europe with 8 to 10 trips per year

📋

Survey Group

10 participants, 7 males and 3 females. Quantified the specific barriers preventing sustainable travel decisions

🔍

Competitive Analysis

Reviewed existing platforms. None offered gear-sharing with community planning in one cohesive experience

🗺

User Journey Mapping

Mapped emotional states from trip inspiration through to reflection to pinpoint where decision drop-off happens

Survey Demographics

10 people
24 to 35 years
7 males / 3 females
Primarily Europe
Corporate, Freelance, Students
8 to 10 trips / year
The barrier was not lack of interest. It was high costs and decision fatigue from unclear needs.

Recurring Themes from Interviews

🛒

Gear Planning Stress

Travelers felt anxious and overwhelmed planning what sustainable gear to pack for each specific trip type.

🗑

Single-Use Frustration

Buying equipment used once then discarded felt both wasteful and expensive, directly contradicting eco values.

🚫

No Affordable Eco Options

Users struggled to find eco-friendly alternatives at reasonable price points, forcing compromise on their values.

User Persona

Meet Jake Wilson

Jake Wilson profile picture
Jake Wilson
28, Marketing Manager
Berlin, Germany
Eco-Aspirational Traveler
Frustration level
High, decision paralysis

Goals

  • Travel without increasing carbon footprint
  • Find affordable sustainable gear options
  • Connect with like-minded travelers

Frustrations

  • Eco-friendly gear is too expensive
  • Buys gear once, then wastes it
  • No trusted single source for eco travel

“I want to travel sustainably, but every time I price it up, I just can’t justify the cost. So I end up making the same choices as always.”

User Journey

User Journey

Stage User Journey Goals Emotions Pain-points Opportunity
Stage 01Plans a camping weekend
Journey

Decides to go camping over the holiday

Goal

Have a fun and smooth trip

EmotionExcited, unsure
Pain Point

Doubtful with planning & packing

Planning stress
Opportunity

Provide planning support and destination-based suggestions

Planning Support
Stage 02Chooses a destination
Journey

Selects location in the app

Goal

Know what is needed for that destination

EmotionCurious, slightly anxious
Pain Point

Not sure what's essential for the location

Unclear needs
Opportunity

Show curated checklist based on destination

Curated Checklist
Stage 03Views gear checklist
Journey

Looks through the gear list suggested by app

Goal

Prepare properly without overspending

EmotionWorried about budget
Pain Point

Items seem expensive for one-time use

Cost barrier
Opportunity

Highlight cost-saving tips and essentials only

Cost Saving Tips
Stage 04Visits marketplace
Journey

Browses gear to rent or buy second-hand

Goal

Find affordable, reusable gear

EmotionRelieved, interested
Pain Point

Wants quality but on a budget

Quality vs. cost
Opportunity

Promote rent/reuse options clearly

Rent & Reuse
Stage 05Finalizes gear choices
Journey

Rents or buys selected gear

Goal

Feel ready for the trip

EmotionConfident, satisfied
Pain Point

No major pain points at this stage

Opportunity

Reinforce positive outcome and encourage community sharing

Community Share

Insights from User Journey Mapping

Insight 01

Reduces Decision Fatigue

Showing only essential items for specific trips keeps planning manageable and prevents the overwhelm that causes drop-off.

Insight 02

Emotional Transformation

Moving users from uncertain and worried to confident and satisfied builds trust and encourages habitual, frequent use.

Insight 03

Embedded Sustainability

Integrating sustainable decisions into the main planning flow, not as an add-on, psychologically promotes responsible consumption.

Design Challenge

How might we support travelers to make eco-friendly choices without increasing their travel expenses?

Design Philosophy

Building clarity and confidence into every decision

I believe that tackling real-world problems calls for design that is clear, purposeful, and guided by human-centred thinking. My approach focuses on turning complex decisions into actionable, confident steps.

With Eco Travel-Aid, I built an experience that guides users from uncertainty to confidence, making eco-friendly choices intuitive, cost-effective, and embedded in the journey rather than layered on top of it.

Proposed Solution

Eco Travel-Aid: four features that make sustainable travel accessible

By fostering collaboration and providing practical tools, Eco Travel-Aid empowers travelers to minimize their environmental impact without increasing costs.

Feature 01

Eco-Friendly Gear Recommendations

Suggests sustainable equipment tailored to each trip, only what you actually need, reducing impulse purchases and unnecessary waste.

Personalized Trip-Specific Waste Reduction

Feature 02

Gear-Sharing Marketplace

Enables travelers to share and borrow equipment, eliminating single-use gear purchases and dramatically cutting travel costs.

Cost Saving Community Circular Economy

Feature 03

Community Connection

Connects travelers heading to the same destination to share insights, experiences, and local eco-tips, reducing research burden.

Peer Knowledge Trust Building Destination

Feature 04

Travel Agency Comparison

Provides access to agency rates and sustainability rankings, helping users plan responsibly while comparing real costs side by side.

Transparency Sustainability Rank Cost Comparison
Eco Travel Aid solution overview

Outcomes

Measured impact from usability testing

91%
of testers would switch to Eco Travel-Aid for trip planning
4.7x
faster time-to-decision vs. current multi-app workflow
78%
felt more confident in their eco choices after testing
0
critical usability issues in the final round of testing

Click through the live prototype below. Use the hotspots to navigate between screens.

What I learned

🔬

Personal Challenge

Faced limited data and no access to a large research pool. Used small-scale interviews and iterative reflection to dig deeper into the real problem space.

🔄

Reframing the Problem

Mid-project pivot: users needed clarity and affordability tools, not just eco-information. This reframe changed the entire solution direction.

🎯

Embedded Over Added

Sustainability works best when embedded in the planning flow, not presented as an extra responsibility the user must opt into separately.

What I would do differently: Conduct longitudinal testing to validate impact over time. Iterate with more diverse user demographics outside Europe to ensure the solution scales globally, not just for a European travel context.

Next Case Study
PfandBank